HKUST Public Policy Bulletin Issue No.14
A large-scale field experiment on participatory decision-making in China
Jueyu WU, Sherry, Michael MAI, Ke, ZHUANG, MING, Fangxin YI
The rapid expansion of participatory governance initiatives in centralized regimes has sparked debate over their capacity to enhance civic engagement and government accountability. This study investigates the effects of participatory decision-making within participatory budgeting in China with centralized regimes with participatory governance approaches. Drawing on one of the world’s largest participatory budgeting interventions, reaching over 20 million residents, the research examines whether localized democratic practices can cultivate responsive citizenship or, conversely, reinforce authoritarian resilience.
By assessing behavioural and attitudinal changes six months after the intervention, the study provides causal evidence on how community-level participation influences broader civic engagement, perceptions of governmental performance, and accountability-seeking behaviour. The findings suggest that participatory budgeting can generate measurable increases in non-budgetrelated civic actions and demands for improvement from the central government, while simultaneously boosting satisfaction with national policies and local economic conditions..
These results hold important implications for policymakers, development practitioners, and governance reform advocates. They highlight both the opportunities and risks of integrating democratic practices into centralized governance structures, and underscore the need for careful design of participatory institutions to ensure they foster genuine civic empowerment rather than symbolic engagement
|
You may also read the Public Policy Bulletin on the HKUST eBookshelf.
Authors |
|
Further readingWu, S.J., Mai, K.M., Zhuang, M. et al. A large-scale field experiment on participatory decision-making in China. Nature Human Behaviour 8, 2119–2126 (2024). |